Reviews
Out Of Time with Colin Dunne,
London 2009/Ireland 2008
Donald Hutera, The Times (February 23, 2009)
Colin Dunne took his first Irish dance class at the age of three. Within
six years he'd won the first of many world championship titles. Later,
his grown-up credits include, inevitably, Riverdance and, more recently,
an acclaimed (and self-parodying) supporting role in Fabulous Beast's
award-winning The Bull.
Now 40, the Birmingham-born dancer's likeable new solo show is no puffed-up
piece of exhibitionism à la Michael Flatley. At roughly an hour-long,
Out of Time is instead an intriguingly postmodern, chamber-sized exercise
in career self-assessment and a chance for Dunne perhaps to lay to rest
some rewarding but demanding demons.
He begins and ends the performance barefoot on a stage empty save for
a low, multihinged white platform. This is cleverly reconfigured into
a screen on which to project vintage film footage of Irish dancers. Like
the Blue Peter clip of Dunne as a gifted ten-year-old, they are a charming
yet ghostly part of a tradition that haunts him and against which he's
trying to redefine himself.
It's fascinating to observe Dunne's silent deconstruction of the warm-up:
arms loose, sinking his weight into the floor, suddenly flicking out a
quick foot or springing into the air. He's nimble and neat, but at times
too broody and introspective for the show's good. Steering clear of facile
connections with his audience, he risks not engaging with us at all. But
not to worry. Dunne tides us over with a playful sailor's hornpipe, balancing
this diversion with sober, overextended experimentation in which his feet
are wired for sound. Later he sits, sweat-soaked, and removes his shoes.
The release is palpable, empathy-inducing, as is the loose, free-flown
solo that ends the evening. What we're witnessing is a dancer's liberation.
Mary Coll, The Irish Independent (4 February 2008)
Colin Dunne’s new solo dance work, Out of Time, has been a long
time coming, in fact it would appear that it has taken his entire life
as a dancer to get to this point, and from the wide grin that lights up
his face every now and then during the performance, he seems more than
a little delighted about it all, and he should be.
This is a remarkably uplifting and extraordinarily moving memoir in motion
on the subject of the dancer and his dance, seeking to explore where he
personally fits into the inner sanctum of traditional Irish dance, and
where that dance itself fits into the wider tradition of dancing as a
form of creative expression. Dunne has spent a lifetime dancing his way
to here from the fiercely competitive arena of the Irish Dancing Feis
and the various national and international Irish Dancing Championships
to the Irish dancing carnival that followed the Riverdance phenomenon.
More perhaps than most, he has earned the right to ask all the big questions,
and in Out of Time he does, with passion, but without a hint of arrogance,
so that what surprises is the disarmingly intimate and almost tender manner
in which he is also prepared to answer them. Alone and barefoot at the
beginning, in a small and deliberately restrained section of the space,
he gradually expands his movement to encompass the entire performance
area, eventually strapping on his dancing shoes as he is joined on various
screens by the projected images of the ghosts of Irish dancing past, as
well as his own ghosts, his ten year old self, dancing for all he is worth
on the BBC’s Blue Peter programme, so that past and present, shadow
and substance loose the lines that divide them as they merge into one
almighty chorus line of dancers, beating out an ancient rhythm that ultimately
refuses to be confined or defined in any narrow or constricting way.
There have been few if any more eloquent or effective contributions to
the decades of debate that have taken place on the subject of what constitutes
the nature and authenticity of Irish step dancing, and certainly none
whatsoever presented with such grace of movement and such gently deprecating
humour as this genuine labour of love.
As always it was a real pleasure just watching Dunne dance, his lightness
of step and fluidity has the hallmark of a real virtuoso performer, but
it was the extent of the deep psychological interrogation, taking place
within this particular piece, which made it so much more rewarding for
the audience. There is a vast amount of emotional intelligence contained
in Out of Time, and an equally large amount of technological intelligence
has been carefully utilised to design and deliver it. Dunne collaborated
in its making with Fionan de Barra for the live sound processing used
to powerful effect throughout, as well as lighting designer Colin Grenfell
and director Sinéad Rushe, so that while it is most definitely
a solo performance, devised and delivered by Dunne, it is also a contemporary
multi-media and inter-disciplinary experience, with film footage from
the RTE archives cleverly redesigned by Sean Westgate and recorded music
from Martin Hayes and Dennis Cahill. Out of Time will most definitely
delight and provoke in equal measure.
Night-Light, Edinburgh 2005/London 2006
Lucy Powell, Time Out **** (24-31
May 2006)
An impossibly proportioned bed, a rope, one woman
in her pyjamas and another in an oddly insectile get-up with a mischievous
glint in her eye. The scene is set for out of Inc’s surreally suggestive
foray into the unblinking world of the insomniac. Sinéad Rushe breathes
deeply, puts on her eye mask and, with the help of a soothing sleep tape,
tries to leap into unconsciousness. But like the cockroach she at times
resembles Camille Litalien’s maddening, maniacal antics flourish in
the darkness. Telling spiteful fairytales, hanging under the bed, rocking
and humming songs, dangling upside down from a twirling rope, she is bent
on stealing every attempt at sleep from her rational, beleaguered counterpart. Between them, Rushe and Litalien uncover a wealth of wisdom on
this most slippery of subjects. Childhood games, snatches of songs and
disconnected facts come unbidden to life, and the harder Rushe tries to
ignore Litalien’s tauntings, the louder she shouts to be heard.
Beautifully lit and imaginatively staged by Rushe, the dialogue is scattered
with torn rags of poetry, the discomforting detritus of an unquiet mind.
It is hugely evocative.
Metro**** (23 August 2005)
The starting point for this lively, absorbing multi-dimensional two-hander
is that strange, hallucinatory world between waking and sleep, as experienced
by a child who's afraid of the dark.
Using a fluid, precisely synchronised blend of dance, movement, mime,
narrative and dialogue, Sinéad Rushe and Camille Litalien explore
outward from here to touch on the primal origins of nursery rhymes and
fairly tales, and on the real-life terrors or anxieties that our minds
— throughout our lives — translate into various kinds of bogeymen.
Barring one or two slightly over-extended dance passages, it's a meticulously
crafted piece, displaying a rigorous thoroughness in conception, structure
and execution that's all too rare on the Fringe. Its darker moods
are disarmingly offset with flashes of quizzical humour, as Rushe and
Litalien step momentarily or partially out of character, while shadowy,
deftly modulated lighting and an atmospheric score wrap up an impressive
theatrical package.
Claire Piela, The List **** (15-18 August
2005/Issue 259)
What are you afraid of? Be it spiders or loss of loved ones, the
things we fear the most cling to the subconscious and are stirred in our
dreams where we explore our deepest anxieties. Delving into the
imagination of two children, out of Inc's piece is about fear born out
of the threat of external forces, such as the nurse with a needle, as
well as the fear of loneliness, illness and death which haunts us all.
Devised by Sinéad Rushe and Camille Litalien, the performance
combines fragments of dance with poetic storytelling and unwinds to the
exhilarating musical contrasts of Chopin and Massive Attack. The
performers use dance, mime and physical theatre, contorting their bodies
to convey their childhood imagery and stepping out of role to confront
the audience with own personal reflections on what frightens them.
Best at its most strange, with moments of sleepy darkness so innovatively
framed, this show will quietly charm you.
Life in the Folds, Edinburgh 2001/London
2002
Rachel Halliburton, The Evening Standard (17
January 2002)
Life, but not as we know it.
Henri Michaux was a rigorous explorer of his internal universe, using
literature, drugs, and eastern meditation to push back the boundaries
of a mind that was forever rebelling against his bourgeois Belgian birth.
Life in the Folds pays an intriguing tribute to the writer and artist,
even if it provokes questions about whether Michaux's hallucinogenic wanderings
ever produced visions of two girls clad in shimmering green trousers and
waistcoats, dancing energetically to Irish and jazz music.
For that, in essence, is the show. Sinéad Rushe is a former All-Ireland
dance champion, while Jenny Boot is her enthusiastic collaborator –
and from such unpromising beginnings a piece of exquisite, ironic and
sharply engaging theatre has been born.
Michaux was obsessed with the threat a hostile external world poses to
the fragile identity of the individual, so it is appropriate that Life
in the Folds begins with a prose poem about sharp instruments piercing
the skin until 'a neurone spits out its electric suffering.' As
the lights dim at the show's start, a spotlight highlights a member of
the audience, who turns on the other audience members with a challenging,
amused stare, and talks about being attacked by a sabre as if she were
recalling an entertainingly embarrassing incident at a cocktail party.
Rushe and Boot have calculated the tone carefully, so that Michaux's
often violent mental meanderings are recalled with the detached humour
that made him a master of absurdity. One poem reflects on how he
decided to put people who irritated him into a sack – whether they
were 'mediocrities' or 'boring women', and the pair accompany their recitation
with a vividly choreographed session where they become comically trapped
in the sacks the writer designated for social rejects.
The Irish dancing is executed professionally yet ironically – since
both give it a raised-eyebrow approach which means that physically they
are in tune with the urbanity of the words they utter. 'I reduce
him to a sausage,' cries Rushe, leaping around and pounding her hand into
her fist, while Boot shows the audience a face that could launch a thousand
absurdities.
The result is a refreshing tribute to a fascinating writer. This is a
bold and intelligent delight.
Jonathan Lovett, The Scotsman (17 August 2001)
Imagine Poe and Gogol meeting to get high and dance and you come close
to the experience of watching this startling fusion of movement, music
and hallucinogenic prose. Dark and surreal, the writings of Henry Michaux
were often concocted after a heavy dose of mescaline and his Kafkaesque
world of sinister images reveals a restless mind at war with itself.
The adventurous duo, Sinéad Rushe and Jenny Boot, have taken two
books of Michaux's poetry and in a collection of dance scenes have created
something equally exotic and vivid. The performers blend their bodies
to depict the motion of a saw through a chest, the extraction of tendons
from limbs and the spit-roasting of a dinner party guest. When they break,
they pick up the connecting thread of a character called Plume who suffers
a thousand tortures and humiliations but exacts revenge by imprisoning
people in cellars and bags.
If this all sounds a little too warped, then rest assured it is done with
the lightest of touches and the scene where the two women imprison themselves
in large bags and roll around the stage is brilliantly executed and very
witty.
They capture the poetry's essence in the movement and clever fusion of
Irish and jazz music, and bring something of Michaux's spirit in their
appearance; the two pale, waif-like figures would not look out of place
in one of Michaux's paintings. Their wide-eyed look of surprise would
suit the absurdist comedy of a Beckett play. There are no exaggerated
expressions or mugging; they let their feet do the talking - particularly
Rushe, whose manic jig routines are a brilliant cross between Riverdance
and Michael Jackson's Thriller video. The exhaustion of both actors at
the end of the play is testament to an exhilarating piece of work which
is that rare thing on the Fringe - inventive contemporary dance with provocative
subject matter.
Nick Thorpe, The Independent (9
August 2001)
If you like trawling for hidden magic in back-alley Fringe venues, let
me save you time. Life in the Folds, tucked away in Hill Street,
is the most delightfully bizarre piece of theatre you're likely to find
this side of mescaline. From the surrealist prose poetry of Henri Michaux
(himself a little partial to hallucinogens, apparently), Sinéad
Rushe and Jenny Boot conjure a waking dream encompassing everything from
jazz dance to slapstick, drum'n'bass to gothic horror.
Threading the poems and music together is a clown-like character called
Plume, who travels the world in a series of tragi-comic and grotesque
adventures, including the accidental dismemberment of his wife. Rushe
and Boot pass his role seamlessly between them, using startlingly inventive
choreography, a few choice props and a humorous synergy that recalls Beckett's
Vladimir and Estragon.
One moment, Rushe is a fine-tuned blur across the stage; the next, she
is stuffed in a canvas bag, ready for the 'sausage cellar'. It's like
Hieronymus Bosch meets Riverdance. Yet the scenes of camp horror (spit-roasting
of annoying dinner-party guests, anyone?) only serve to heighten the unexpected
beauty in this oddly life-enhancing show. See it for dance theatre at
its innovative, exuberant best.
|